You can get The Gist on this story here
The most expensive concert ticket in Britain this autumn was for a soul singer most of Britain has never heard of. Mica Millar plays New Century, a mid-sized room in Manchester, and a ticket with a face value of about £30 was listed on Viagogo at £5,899, a markup of 19,728%. The listing sat among 1,600 others that campaigners at FanFair Alliance found across nearly 300 gigs at 13 of Greater Manchester's grassroots venues, Band On The Wall, Gorilla, Night & Day, the small rooms where careers begin, and more than 75% of those listings belonged to just 3 professional touts, based in Latvia, North America and Germany, some of them speculative, tickets the sellers did not yet own. Three men, none of them in the country, holding most of the resale market for Manchester's smallest stages: that is the picture Westminster was handed on the eve of the Labour conference, and Westminster has responded with something rarer than a press release, a bill team, civil servants now drafting a law to ban for-profit ticket resale outright.
Mica Millar
Viagogo's defence is partly true and worth hearing: the £5,899 was an outlier and likely a pricing error; current listings for the show top out at £46, some tickets have sold for £16, and actual transactions across these events averaged around 1.4 times face value. The law is coming regardless, announced in November 2025, drafted into the King's Speech, now staffed, with the civil servants working on the hardest clause: how to stop touts and platforms simply moving offshore, where the 3 Manchester touts already live. One precedent sits in plain sight: reselling a football ticket without authorisation has been illegal in Britain for 3 decades. The gig was never given the same protection as the match.
Why does touting exist at all? Because concert tickets are deliberately priced wrong. An artist who could charge £150 for a seat and charges £30 has made a decision about the £120 in between, and the reason is more selfish than it looks. Anyone who has stood in a crowd knows the difference between a room that queued for months and a room that expensed its tickets. A gig gets made twice, once on the stage and once on the floor, and the £30 crowd, the one that knows every word, is doing half the work.
Price the place at what it would bear, and you fill it with the people who can bear it: older, seated, filming the encore, gone before it to beat the traffic. Artists underprice because the crowd is part of the band, which makes the cheap ticket a gift with a job to do, and the tout the man standing between the gift and the person it was built around. He takes more than the margin. He swaps out the room. So the law being drafted looks like a consumer-protection measure, and underneath it sits a stranger question: when an artist turns down £120 a seat, whose money is that? The artist thinks the fan's. The market thinks whoever got there first. Parliament now has to choose.
The gift has defenders, and the best of them fight like accountants. In 2023 Robert Smith priced The Cure's American tour from $20 a seat, refused dynamic pricing outright, then watched Ticketmaster's fees climb past the price of some tickets themselves, went through the fee schedule in public, declared himself sickened, and extracted partial refunds for every buyer, something close to unprecedented in Ticketmaster's history. Ed Sheeran's camp ran the same campaign at the gates, cancelling 10,000 touted tickets and turning resold ones away at the stadium doors, selling the same seats back at face value on the spot. The weapons were audits, cancellations and refunds; the cheap ticket defended with the instruments of the box office. Smith could charge $400 a seat and sell out. The $20 ticket is what it costs him to look out from the stage and see his own crowd.
Saint Rob
Britain has already run the experiment on the premium flowing the other way. In August 2024, Oasis fans queued online for hours and watched £135 standing tickets become £355 by the checkout, labelled "in demand," and the fury, national enough to stir Parliament and the regulator, targeted the band's own sale. The Competition and Markets Authority found no real-time pricing algorithm; cheaper tiers had simply sold first, with costlier ones released behind them, but it is preparing to litigate over how that was communicated, and over "platinum" seats at nearly 2.5 times the standard price with no extra benefit. The band blamed the promoters, dropped the model for America, and cancelled over 50,000 resold tickets. £355 from a tout and £355 from the box office produce the same temperature of rage, aimed at different people, and what moves the anger around is who harvests the premium that scarcity creates.
Only 3 currencies can allocate a scarce seat: money, time, and loyalty, and each carries its own moral charge. When a tout takes the premium in money, he is a thief. When the artist's own machinery takes it in money, the artist is a traitor. When it is taken in time, the overnight queue, the 10 am scramble, the ballot, it is somehow sacred, the one payment nobody resents, because time is the one currency issued to everyone in equal daily amounts, and spending it on a band is the plainest proof of devotion on offer. A resale ban is Britain legislating a national preference for paying in time, and that preference hands the seats to the young, the devoted and the time-rich over the wealthy and the busy, which is precisely the allocation the artists intended when they underpriced the ticket in the first place. The bill being drafted is, at bottom, a law to protect queuing.
Ireland built this law in 2021 and is the crystal ball. When Oasis went on sale for Croke Park, under a statute banning above-face resale, Ticketmaster priced the surge itself and defined the surged price as the face value, which made it legal, while seats on the official face-value exchange traded at €536 to €596 plus a €77.44 service charge; the Irish regulator's investigation remains, in its own words, active and ongoing. The premium a crowd will pay does not vanish when you outlaw collecting it. The law decides who collects, and in Ireland the collector turned out to be the primary seller, renaming the markup until it fit through the statute.
The ledgers explain the choir. Live Nation, owner of Ticketmaster, supports the cap warmly, noting Ticketmaster already limits UK resale to face value, another way of saying the law would outlaw its competitors' business model while leaving its own untouched. StubHub warns of black markets; Viagogo warns the law will entrench Ticketmaster; every prediction is a ledger speaking, and none is empty: in September hundreds of teenage fans were left outside a Katseye show at Co-op Live after being missold tickets through resale sites. The economists' case for resale, that it moves seats to those who value them most, has never survived the question of whose £5,899 that value is denominated in, or the Viagogo chief executive's considered view that Bob Marley would have approved of ticket touting, after, he allowed, some education.
An ardent supporter of intermediary markups
Face value is the whole argument in 2 words. Nearly every price in Britain is a measurement, the market's running estimate of what you will pay, revised by the second: the flight, the hotel room, the surge-priced taxi home from the gig. A face value is a statement: the seller declares what the thing should cost and prints the declaration on the object, where the market can read it and disagree. The concert ticket is one of the last statement-prices in the country, and the draft law amounts to Parliament ruling on whether a statement-price can still exist in a market that treats every price as an error awaiting correction.
The £5,899 ticket never sold. Viagogo is right about that, and it hardly matters, because somewhere in the spreadsheet of a man in Riga or Hamburg it sat listed while the thing it named went ahead without him: a few hundred people in a room in Manchester, most of them in for under £30, watching a soul singer the touts holding her tickets had almost certainly never played. The premium can be intercepted at the door, renamed at the box office, capped by Parliament, and argued over by every ledger in the industry. The night itself changes hands exactly once, at face value, in the dark, between the stage and the floor, and nobody has found a way to list it yet.
See you on the next one.
Refs
